I really like Thieves. Really-really.
I'm writing an 0e homage. The classes of antiquity are all here. I have placed the thief, paladin, assassin, the monk & some others in an appendix, along with the gnome and two other species. I did so because I want these other choices to be strictly optional. I would ideally see players pick from the four races and from the three classes to make the first PC in the first campaign using this rule set. Because tradition or something.
But I really, really like me a Thief.
The Thief allows for multiclassing among Dwarfs and Halflings. That's an important flavor element; probably as important as keeping the Thief out of the original lineup, all things being equal.
Opinion question: would it be sacrelige to present the Thief up-front with the original three? Put me some arguments for and/or against letting the Thief live in the front of the book instead of the back where he is now.
I'm writing an 0e homage. The classes of antiquity are all here. I have placed the thief, paladin, assassin, the monk & some others in an appendix, along with the gnome and two other species. I did so because I want these other choices to be strictly optional. I would ideally see players pick from the four races and from the three classes to make the first PC in the first campaign using this rule set. Because tradition or something.
But I really, really like me a Thief.
The Thief allows for multiclassing among Dwarfs and Halflings. That's an important flavor element; probably as important as keeping the Thief out of the original lineup, all things being equal.
Opinion question: would it be sacrelige to present the Thief up-front with the original three? Put me some arguments for and/or against letting the Thief live in the front of the book instead of the back where he is now.
[0e homage game] On the Inclusion of the Thief
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire